Abstract
People tend to believe that power imbalance that women and men experience in an intimate relationship is natural, the way it should be and of course, something that should not be debated. The problem with this argument and/or generalisation is that it usually suggests that hegemonic masculinity should not be interrogated. In Africa, power imbalances are one of the challenges that have limited women in society. This practice is influenced by culture, religion, traditional practices and laws which influence perceptions, and expectations of people in intimate relationships. This study, Power imbalances among intimate partners in Obio-Akpor Local Government Area encapsulate the dynamics of gender power relations that exist in intimate, heterosexual relationships in four communities. This study seeks to examine intimate partners perception of decision making, the extent of its social acceptability and relevance of their socio-economic circumstances towards power imbalances. The population for this study was twenty-seven thousand three hundred and fifty-five. Sample size was calculated using the Taro Yamame determination technique which stood at three hundred and ninety-four. The study employed a survey research design which consisted of twenty-two items on a four-point Likert scale of (Agree, Strongly Agree, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree). Simple percentage (%) and frequency table was used to analyze the data. The study found that partners socio-economic circumstances did not reflect a significant degree of influence on power imbalances. This study therefore, recommend for responsive gender equality programmes that support and empower both partners.
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2021
Jennifer Chinoye Amadi.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Not long ago, power imbalances is increasingly recognized in most relationships as some element that fuels inequalities and conflictamong intimate partners, particularlythose in heterosexual relationships. Hidden powers exist and structure many partners’ interactions despite their true and good intentions to each other In this day and age, it is believed scholars are currently looking beyond individual behaviours to specific factors and/or conditions that influence behaviour. These factors may include but are not limited to - social norms, patriarchy, and hegemonic masculinity Similarly, these cultural expectations are shrouded in the ideals of society which can be considered stumbling blocks for successful contemporary relationships among the millennia Substantially, all these factors widen power imbalances among intimate partners which makes it difficult for female partners to discuss issues like sex, consent and sexuality with their partners especially when they are older and more sexually experienced The situation of power imbalances among intimate partners may differ across the urban, pre-urban and the rural areas and these differences can be associated with the influence of socio-economic circumstances, predominant cultural practices and local nuances that uniquely affect women. According to There are about four types of abuses as identified in the literature and they are; physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, and economic abuse. Physical abuse involves some physical contact between the victim and the abuser and it is well documented throughout history Although, another form of economic abuse can be forced deposit of partner’s earnings into the abuser’s bank account, a situation that takes away cash from the victim against their will Besides domestic violence, other forms of oppression exist in unequal gender relations between female and male partners, in education, income-earning, and socio-economic status which is powered by male privilege and do not allow female partners to self-support and be in charge of their lives. Long ago, the United Nations Systems rolled out several treaties, frameworks and conventions to address issues around gender inequalities both in public and private spaces one of which are the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) 1979, outcome document of the World Conference on Women in Beijing, China 1995, and the African Charter on Gender and Development. These documents remain crucial to understanding and addressing issues of gendered power relations both in policy framing and programmatic designs. In Nigeria, major highlights of 2019 includes news of intimate partner violence– from killing of one’s partners to serial killing of young women by a male sex predator in Rivers State A close assessment of the above-referenced circumstances offers a tale-tall a story of power imbalances in intimate partner’s relationship in the Nigerian society. An increase of intimate partners’ violence present with other forms of human rights issues such as making more orphan and vulnerable children, loss of societal values, and increased burden on the social institution
Results
This chapter gives an explanation of the data obtained during the field work. It is structured around the objectives with specific field data presented under each objective. These findings signify important entry points to discussing issues of power imbalances with particular focus on this study among intimate partners. A total of three hundred and fifty-nine (359) copies of the questionnaire were retrieved successfully making the response rate 91 percent. ( Source: Author’s Fieldwork, 2019 Regarding respondents’ perception on decision making, Source: Author’s Fieldwork, 2019 ( Source: Author’s Fieldwork, 2019 ( Source: Author’s Fieldwork, 2019 We found that 68.2 percent of the respondents were females, while 31.8 percent were males. We found that female partners are socio-culturally disadvantaged in terms of decision making. Although most of the respondents agree that the male partners consult with their female partners before making decisions. However, 38.4 percent agree that female partners must always seek permission from her male partner before making any decision, at all. The respondents, therefore, disagree with other questions under decision making. This finding is in line with what (Asiyanbola, 2005) discussed in a paper presentation at the XXV International Conference Tours, Francia. It was stated that women are socioeconomically disadvantaged in-home fronts because they had to depend on the men to make all the decisions. Indeed, most respondents believed that female partners should be involved in the decision-making process, especially, when the female partner is educated and working so that she can contribute and bring smart ideas to the table. However, there are exceptions when it becomes a matter of life and death. This again points to the importance of being in a relationship with an educated and enlightened partner to guarantee quality decision making, particularly, for the female partner. Partners are not fully equal, there tends to be a master–slave relationship between couples which is not in alignment with equal power relations for intimate partner relationship. Although, the society’s expectation of power relations among intimate partners often influence acceptance of power imbalances. For example, some male partners and/or couples could do certain things for their female partners at home with no one watching but cannot do the same thing in the open because people may misconstrue it to be a weakness. The result corroborate with the ideals of radical feminism It is generally believed that female partners who have good education may not be submissive to their male partners. But with the present economy, this belief is no more adhered to because without education, one may not be rightly positioned to get a decent job with good remuneration needed to support his/her family. According to the result, majority of the respondents agree that it is best for female partners to be educated and get good jobs before marriage. In Adanikin, McGrath, Padmadas, and sexuality (2019) study of Analysis of Ethnographic Vignette Couple Data in Southwest Nigeria, social acceptability and socioeconomic circumstances of partners and/or couples deviate with the findings of this research. This difference could be influenced by prevailing culture and geographical difference of the study area. However, findings of Abama and Kwaja (2009) in Violence Against Women in Nigeria affirms that most sexual and gender-based violence in the home happens when the male partner provides everything. This therefore, justify that the possibility that a male partner who provides everything to his family will likely decide solely on what happens in the family whether it violates the rights of his partner or not exist.
18-24
159
25-31
146
32 and above
54
Male
114
Female
245
Single
213
Married
119
Widowed
20
Divorced
2
Separated
5
FSLC
80
Bachelors
182
Postgraduates
97
Employed
58
Self-employed
150
Unemployed
151
0 – 30,000.00
130
31,000 – 120,000
120
121,000 – above
109
The male partner (husband) should make all the decisions in the home without consulting the female partner (his wife).
20
48
58
93
140
It is inappropriate for the female partner to make decisions at home.
19
57
67
116
100
A female partner should not negotiate choices or take personal decisions at home.
19
86
60
101
93
When a female partner seeks to have an opinion in household decision making, she will be disloyal.
11
51
52
111
134
Rich male partners should make all the decisions in the home because he provides for everyone.
12
41
51
90
165
The female partner cannot decide when and when not to have sex with her male partner in their relationship.
15
65
57
101
121
It is only the male partner that should determine the number of children to be born in a union.
25
43
49
104
138
The female partner must always seek permission from her male partner before making any decision.
49
89
57
92
72
There must be gap between the male partner and female partner in education attainment, and income earning.
12
57
50
99
141
Partners socioeconomic background would determine the level of power they individually hold in their relationship.
22
51
53
114
119
A female partner should not be well educated so that she does not seek equality with her male partner (husband).
12
27
50
102
168
A very rich female partner will not be submissive to her male partner.
15
49
42
110
143
Educated female partner should have equal power with her male partner.
28
39
51
121
120
Female partners must never express themselves before their male partners.
27
58
37
98
139
In a relationship, the female partner is bound by norms (traditions) to honor, obey and submit to the authority of her male partner.
50
85
43
90
91
The male partner has right over the female partner including withdrawal of certain privileges from her.
21
65
40
113
120
Education and career makes a female partner disrespectful to her male partner.
14
28
47
120
150
When a female partner has less power in her relationship, it will make the relationship last long.
17
52
45
100
145
The male partner is always right in the relationship.
26
48
45
105
135
Equal power relations allow partners to create intimacy and enjoy relationship success.
76
74
51
88
70
Unequal power relations give rise to gender-based violence in the relationship.
51
81
71
83
73
Unequal power relations take away individual partner’s ability to be happy, healthy and well
54
72
59
105
69
Conclusion
The general goal of this study was to understand factors that intersect power imbalances in intimate partner relationship in Obio-Akpor LGA of River State. Specific objectives include; to examine the perception of power imbalances on decision making among intimate partners; assess relevance of socio-economic circumstances of partners; and examine the extent of social acceptability of power imbalances among intimate partners. There is no doubt that power imbalances are a major obstacle to achieving success in intimate partner relationships. Unequal power relations may produce intimate partner violence in relationships which may hinder progress in achieving development targets in Nigeria. Despite the growing recognition of violence as public health and human rights concern, it continues to have an unjustifiably low priority on human relationships. In most romantic relationships, the female partner has an obligation to be private, submissive, and to embrace the idea of the second sex and these expectations further expand the question “and what about the women? The response to this question - that women’s location in, and experience of, in most situations is different from that of men in those situations was not justified in this study.