Journal of Blood Pressure

Journal of Blood Pressure

Journal of Blood Pressure – Submit Paper

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Submit Your Cardiovascular Physiology Research

Join leading physiologists advancing our understanding of blood pressure regulation, hemodynamics, and cardiovascular system function through rigorous peer-reviewed research

21 Days Average Review
60 Days to Publication
100% Open Access
Start Your Submission Now

Complete your submission in 15 minutes

Two Convenient Submission Methods

We offer two streamlined pathways for submitting your cardiovascular physiology research. Choose the method that best fits your workflow and manuscript complexity.

RECOMMENDED

ManuscriptZone Portal

Our comprehensive manuscript management system designed for complete control over your submission from initial upload through peer review to publication.

  • Real-time submission status tracking
  • Auto-save functionality prevents data loss
  • Direct communication with editors and reviewers
  • Guided workflow ensures completeness
  • Access to revision history and reviewer comments
  • Secure document management

Best for: Complex manuscripts with multiple authors, extensive supplementary materials, or those requiring detailed tracking throughout the review process.

Submit via ManuscriptZone
QUICK OPTION

Quick Submission Form

A streamlined, single-page submission form for straightforward manuscripts that allows you to submit without creating an account.

  • No account registration required
  • Simple one-page form
  • Fast submission process
  • Upload manuscript and essential files
  • Immediate confirmation email
  • Transferred to ManuscriptZone for review

Best for: Straightforward submissions, single-author manuscripts, or when you need to submit quickly without account setup.

Use Quick Submission Form

What Happens After Submission?

Regardless of which method you choose, your manuscript enters the same rigorous peer review process. Quick submissions are automatically registered in ManuscriptZone, and you'll receive login credentials to track your manuscript's progress through review and production.

Manuscript Types We Publish

Blood Pressure welcomes diverse contributions to cardiovascular physiology research. Our expert reviewers specialize in evaluating mechanistic studies, physiological modeling, and experimental investigations of blood pressure regulation and hemodynamic function.

Original Research Articles

Comprehensive reports of experimental studies investigating cardiovascular physiology, blood pressure regulation mechanisms, hemodynamic responses, vascular function, or autonomic control systems.

Methodological Studies

Novel techniques for measuring blood pressure, assessing vascular function, modeling cardiovascular systems, or analyzing hemodynamic data. Include validation studies and technical innovations.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses

Comprehensive syntheses of physiological mechanisms, experimental findings, or methodological approaches in cardiovascular physiology and blood pressure research.

Short Communications

Concise reports of preliminary findings, novel observations, or time-sensitive discoveries in cardiovascular physiology that warrant rapid dissemination.

Physiological Modeling Studies

Computational and mathematical models of cardiovascular function, blood pressure regulation, hemodynamic systems, or physiological control mechanisms with experimental validation.

Technical Notes

Detailed descriptions of experimental protocols, instrumentation setups, data analysis pipelines, or technical modifications for cardiovascular physiology research.

Perspective & Opinion Articles

Expert viewpoints on emerging concepts, controversial findings, or future directions in cardiovascular physiology and blood pressure research.

Case Studies

Detailed physiological investigations of unique cardiovascular responses, unusual hemodynamic patterns, or exceptional cases that advance mechanistic understanding.

Discipline-Specific Focus Areas

Our reviewers have particular expertise in:

  • Arterial baroreceptor function and autonomic regulation
  • Vascular smooth muscle physiology and endothelial function
  • Renal mechanisms of blood pressure control
  • Cardiac output and peripheral resistance interactions
  • Circadian rhythms in cardiovascular function
  • Exercise physiology and hemodynamic responses
  • Age-related changes in cardiovascular regulation
  • Experimental hypertension models and mechanisms

Pre-Submission Checklist

Ensure your manuscript is complete and properly formatted before submission. This checklist helps prevent delays and expedites the editorial screening process.

Manuscript File

Word (.docx) or LaTeX format, double-spaced, with line numbers. Include title, abstract (250 words), keywords (5-8 terms), and all sections properly formatted.

Figures & Tables

High-resolution figures (TIFF/EPS, 300 DPI minimum) with descriptive captions. Tables in editable format with clear headers and legends.

Ethics Documentation

Institutional review board approval for human studies. Animal care committee approval with protocol numbers. Informed consent statements where applicable.

Author Information

Complete names, affiliations, ORCID IDs, and email addresses for all authors. Corresponding author clearly designated with full contact details.

Competing Interests

Declaration of financial relationships, institutional affiliations, or other interests that could influence the research or its interpretation.

Cover Letter

Brief letter explaining the significance of your findings, their contribution to cardiovascular physiology, and why they suit Blood Pressure's scope.

Reporting Guidelines for Physiological Research

We strongly encourage adherence to discipline-specific reporting standards:

  • ARRIVE Guidelines: For animal studies in cardiovascular physiology
  • STROBE Statement: For observational studies involving human subjects
  • CONSORT: For randomized controlled trials of physiological interventions
  • PRISMA: For systematic reviews and meta-analyses
  • MIQE Guidelines: For quantitative PCR and gene expression studies

Peer Review Timeline

We maintain transparent, predictable timelines throughout the review process. Our expert reviewers in cardiovascular physiology provide constructive feedback to strengthen your manuscript.

1

Submission & Initial Screening

Your manuscript undergoes automated plagiarism checking (iThenticate) and editorial screening for scope, completeness, and formatting. Manuscripts with similarity index above 30% are returned for revision.

3 days
2

Editor Assignment

An associate editor with expertise in your specific area of cardiovascular physiology is assigned. The editor evaluates your manuscript's suitability and identifies appropriate reviewers.

3-5 days
3

Peer Review

Typically 2-3 expert reviewers with specialized knowledge in your research area provide detailed feedback on methodology, data interpretation, physiological significance, and presentation quality.

21 days
4

Editorial Decision

The editor synthesizes reviewer feedback and makes a decision: Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject. You receive detailed comments and specific revision requests.

28 days total
5

Revision & Re-review

Submit your revised manuscript with a point-by-point response to reviewer comments. Revised manuscripts undergo expedited re-review focusing on how concerns were addressed.

14 days
6

Acceptance & Production

Accepted manuscripts enter production for copyediting, typesetting, and final formatting. You'll review proofs before publication to ensure accuracy.

10 days
7

Publication

Your article is published online with immediate open access. It receives a DOI and is indexed in major databases including and .

60 days total

Fast-Track Review Option

For time-sensitive discoveries or urgent physiological findings, we offer expedited review with decisions within 14 days. Contact the editorial office when submitting to request fast-track consideration.

Why Cardiovascular Physiologists Choose Blood Pressure

📚

Specialized Expertise

Reviewers and editors with deep knowledge in cardiovascular physiology, hemodynamics, and blood pressure regulation mechanisms

📈

Indexed in Major Databases

Google Scholar, and discipline-specific cardiovascular databases

Rapid Publication

Average 21 days to first decision, 60 days from submission to publication with transparent timeline tracking

🌐

Global Open Access

Immediate worldwide availability with no subscription barriers, maximizing reach to the cardiovascular physiology community

Ethical Publishing Standards

Adheres to COPE best practices. Rigorous plagiarism screening. Transparent peer review. Adherence to radiation safety and patient privacy regulations.

💰

APC Waivers Available

Financial assistance for authors from low-income countries and unfunded research to ensure equitable access to publication

Submission Requirements & Guidelines

Manuscript Preparation

Prepare your manuscript according to these specifications to ensure smooth processing:

Structure & Formatting

  • Title: Concise and descriptive (maximum 150 characters), clearly indicating the physiological system or mechanism studied
  • Abstract: Structured format (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions) not exceeding 250 words
  • Keywords: 5-8 terms from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) or relevant physiological terminology
  • Introduction: Clear statement of the physiological question, relevant background, and study objectives
  • Methods: Detailed protocols enabling replication, including animal/human subject details, instrumentation, measurements, and statistical analyses
  • Results: Logical presentation of findings with appropriate figures and tables, avoiding interpretation
  • Discussion: Interpretation of results in physiological context, comparison with existing literature, limitations, and implications
  • References: Vancouver style, numbered consecutively in order of appearance

Data & Materials

We encourage transparency and reproducibility in cardiovascular physiology research:

Data Availability

  • Raw physiological data should be deposited in appropriate repositories (e.g., PhysioNet, Dryad, Figshare)
  • Analysis code and scripts should be made available (GitHub, Zenodo, or supplementary materials)
  • Custom instrumentation designs and protocols should be described in sufficient detail for replication
  • Include data availability statement indicating where data can be accessed

Ethics & Compliance

All research involving human or animal subjects must meet ethical standards:

Required Approvals

  • Human Studies: Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval with protocol number, informed consent procedures, and adherence to Declaration of Helsinki
  • Animal Studies: Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approval, compliance with ARRIVE guidelines, and humane treatment protocols
  • Clinical Trials: Registration in recognized trial registry (ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN) with registration number included
  • Biosafety: Appropriate containment levels and safety protocols for physiological specimens or pathogens

After Submission: What to Expect

Communication & Updates

Stay informed throughout the review process with regular updates:

Immediate Confirmation

Receive automated confirmation email with manuscript ID within minutes of submission

📊

Status Tracking

Monitor progress through ManuscriptZone portal showing current stage and estimated timelines

💬

Editor Communication

Direct messaging with handling editor for questions or clarifications during review

📝

Reviewer Feedback

Detailed comments from expert cardiovascular physiologists with specific revision guidance

Possible Outcomes

Accept

Your manuscript meets publication standards and requires no revisions. Proceeds directly to production and copyediting. Rare outcome (typically 5-10% of submissions).

Minor Revisions

Manuscript is scientifically sound but requires small improvements in presentation, clarification of methods, or additional discussion. Typically no re-review required after revision. Expected outcome for strong submissions (30-40%).

Major Revisions

Significant concerns about methodology, data interpretation, or presentation require substantial revision. Additional experiments or analyses may be requested. Revised manuscript undergoes full re-review. Common outcome (40-50%).

Reject

Manuscript does not meet publication standards due to fundamental flaws, insufficient novelty, or scope mismatch. Detailed feedback provided to guide improvement for other venues. Authors may submit substantially revised work as new submission.

Need Assistance?

Our editorial team is here to support you throughout the submission and review process. For technical assistance, questions about manuscript preparation, or guidance on submission procedures, contact us at [email protected]