Reviewer Guidelines
Guidance for reviewers evaluating allergy manuscripts with rigor and fairness.
Reviewer Role
Provide constructive, timely reviews.
Key Expectations
Evidence Focus
Evaluate study design, exposure measurement, and statistical rigor.
Constructive Tone
Provide actionable feedback that helps authors improve clarity and methodology.
Timeliness
Accept reviews only when you can meet deadlines.
Ethics Checks
Confirm IRB approvals, consent statements, and conflict disclosures.
Data Transparency
Encourage data availability statements and repository use.
Clinical Impact
Assess how findings inform allergy care and guidelines.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Reviewer Impact
Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality.
Timely Feedback
Accept reviews only when deadlines are feasible and communicate delays early.
Scope Fit
Confirm that the manuscript aligns with your expertise before accepting review.
Constructive Feedback
Provide clear recommendations that improve scientific clarity.
Join The Reviewer Pool
Email [email protected] if you are interested in reviewing for IJA. Focus on methodological rigor and patient relevance in your review.
