Journal of Pancreas

Journal of Pancreas

Journal of Pancreas – Editorial Policies

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
EDITORIAL POLICIES

Editorial Policies

JPAN follows rigorous editorial standards to ensure transparent, ethical, and high-quality publication in pancreatic research.

Single Blind Review
Ethics First
Data Transparency
COPE Aligned
01

Peer Review

02

Ethics

03

Conflicts

04

Data

05

Corrections

06

Integrity

Policy Commitments

Core Principles

Peer Review

Single blind peer review with expert reviewers evaluating rigor, novelty, and clinical relevance.

Ethical Compliance

Human and animal research requires approvals, consent statements, and biosafety compliance.

Data Transparency

Data availability statements and repository deposition support reproducibility and trust.

Conflicts Of Interest

Authors must disclose financial or institutional relationships that could influence results. Transparency supports reader trust.

Misconduct Handling

Suspected misconduct is investigated following COPE guidance. Corrections or retractions are issued when needed.

Authorship

All authors must meet contribution criteria and approve the final manuscript. Contributor statements reduce disputes.

Appeals

Authors may appeal decisions with scientific justification. Appeals are reviewed by senior editors independent of original decisions.

!
Policy Integrity

Editorial policies apply consistently across all submissions, including invited content, to maintain fairness.

!
Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are independent of APCs or commercial considerations. Scientific merit drives all decisions.

Ethics Safeguards

Integrity

Conflict Management

Editors and reviewers disclose conflicts to protect independence and maintain trust in decisions.

Corrections

Post publication updates, corrections, or retractions follow clear procedures to preserve the record.

Misconduct Review

Suspected misconduct triggers investigation according to COPE aligned principles.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.

Editorial Workflow

Process

Initial Screening

Submissions are screened for scope fit, ethics, and completeness before peer review begins.

Peer Review

Specialist reviewers assess scientific rigor, novelty, and clinical relevance for pancreatic practice.

Production

Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting, proof review, and DOI assignment before publication.

License And Reuse

Rights

Attribution

Reuse requires proper citation and credit to authors and the journal.

Third Party Content

Secure permissions for previously published figures or tables before submission.

Author Rights

Authors may deposit accepted versions in repositories according to license terms.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.

Additional Notes

Guidance

Submission Support

Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.

Workflow

Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.

Visibility

Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.