Reviewer Resources for JPD
JPD provides reviewers with guidance and tools to deliver clear, balanced evaluations. These resources help you structure reports, address ethics, and support high quality peer review.
Resources That Support Strong Reviews
Review Template
Use a structured review format that separates summary, major concerns, and minor comments. A clear structure helps editors and authors act on feedback. This format keeps the editor focused on actionable decisions.
Ethics and COI Guidance
Confirm that human subjects protections are documented and disclose any conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment.
Reporting Expectations
Evaluate transparency, data availability, and reporting clarity. These elements support reproducibility and reader trust.
Decision Language
Provide recommendations that are specific and justified, focusing on evidence rather than opinion. Clear decision language helps editors act quickly.
Helpful References
Key materials to guide your review.
Key Elements to Evaluate
Use this checklist to keep reviews balanced and comprehensive. It supports consistent coverage of the elements most important to research quality.
Writing Effective Comments
Be specific about what should change and why. Refer to sections, tables, or figures when possible and distinguish between essential fixes and optional improvements.
Communicating With Editors
Use confidential notes to raise ethical concerns, suspected conflicts, or questions about scope. Editors rely on this input to guide final decisions.
Handling Sensitive Content
Manuscripts on trauma, sensitive diagnoses, or vulnerable populations require careful review. Focus on respectful language and appropriate protections.
Requesting Support
If you need guidance on policy or timelines, email [email protected]. The editorial office can provide templates or clarify expectations.
Using Templates
Templates help you organize feedback into major and minor comments. If you would like a sample report, the editorial office can share one.
Extensions and Availability
If you need more time, notify the editor quickly so schedules can be adjusted. Early communication keeps authors informed and maintains trust.
Great reviews are structured, fair, and actionable. The goal is to strengthen the manuscript and protect the scholarly record.
Need a Reviewer Resource?
Access the guidelines below or contact [email protected] for templates and additional support. We can also share sample reports on request.
