Journal of Psychophysiology Practice and Research

Journal of Psychophysiology Practice and Research

Journal of Psychophysiology Practice and Research – Reviewer Guidelines

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
REVIEWERS

Reviewer Guidelines

Guidance for reviewers evaluating psychophysiology manuscripts with rigor and fairness.

Research Metrics Live
Rigor First
Clear Feedback
Timely Review
01

Evidence Focus

Evaluate study design, physiological measures, and statistical rigor.

02

Constructive Tone

Provide actionable feedback that helps authors improve clarity and methodology.

03

Timeliness

Accept reviews only when you can meet deadlines.

Ethics Checks

Confirm IRB approvals, consent statements, and conflict disclosures.

Data Transparency

Encourage data availability statements and repository use.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for clinical translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Join The Reviewer Pool

Email [email protected] if you are interested in reviewing for JPR.