Journal of Death

Journal of Death

Journal of Death – Reviewer Resources

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
Reviewer Resources

Support for High Quality Reviews

JOD provides resources to help reviewers deliver clear, ethical, and timely feedback. Use these tools to strengthen your reviews and support author improvement. These resources also support consistent expectations across reviewers. Global participation is welcome.

I

Guidelines

II

Ethics Support

III

Review Templates

IV

Clear Timelines

V

Editorial Access

VI

Quality Focus

Resource Overview

Tools to Guide Your Review

Reviewer Guidelines

Use the reviewer guidelines page for expectations on confidentiality, constructive feedback, and decision criteria. This ensures consistent review standards across the journal and helps you align with editorial priorities.

Ethics Support

For studies involving sensitive narratives or vulnerable populations, reviewers can consult the editorial office with questions about consent, privacy, or ethical concerns. Early questions often prevent delays later in review.

Decision Clarity

Templates and checklists are available to help structure major and minor comments. Clear reviews improve editor decisions and support timely revisions. They also help reviewers focus on key criteria.

Resources

Key Review Aids

These tools help reviewers provide high quality, actionable feedback.

Templates
Available
Structured Reviews
Major and minor points
Checklists
Helpful
Quality Control
Methods and ethics checks
Support
Responsive
Editorial Office
Questions answered quickly
Process
Clear
Review Flow
Transparent expectations

Best Practice Tips

Provide balanced feedback that highlights strengths and weaknesses. Be specific, cite relevant concerns, and avoid personal language. This helps authors respond effectively and improves the final publication.

When to Ask for Help

If you encounter ethical concerns or conflicts of interest, notify the editor or contact [email protected]. We will advise on the appropriate steps.

Review Quality

High quality reviews address methodology, ethics, and interpretation. Use the checklists to verify that data are reported clearly and that conclusions are supported by evidence. Balanced feedback supports fair editorial decisions. This improves consistency across the journal.

Timeliness Expectations

Timely reviews help authors and editors move decisions forward. If you need more time, contact the editor early so timelines can be adjusted or a replacement reviewer can be invited. Your responsiveness is appreciated.

Resources help reviewers deliver fair, constructive evaluations that strengthen scholarship in death studies. Thank you for your service.

Need a Template or Checklist?

Email [email protected] for reviewer tools and guidance. We are happy to help. Include your manuscript ID if applicable. Typical response time is within 1-2 business days.