Constructive, Ethical Peer Review
Reviewers are essential to the quality and credibility of JOD. These guidelines outline expectations for confidentiality, fairness, and timely, constructive feedback on research in death studies and end-of-life care. Your insights help authors improve and readers trust the evidence.
Confidentiality
Objectivity
Timeliness
Ethical Focus
Methodological Rigor
Respectful Tone
How to Deliver a Strong Review
Evaluate Fit and Rigor
Assess whether the manuscript aligns with JOD scope and whether the methods are appropriate, transparent, and defensible. Comment on strengths and areas for improvement with clear reasoning. Note any missing citations or unclear methods.
Focus on Ethics
Pay close attention to consent procedures, confidentiality, and ethical treatment of participants. Research involving grief and end-of-life care requires sensitivity and clear safeguards.
Provide Actionable Feedback
Offer constructive suggestions that help authors strengthen clarity, analysis, and interpretation. Avoid personal language and focus on the work, not the researcher.
Reviewer Commitments
These standards help maintain the integrity of peer review.
Reviewer Ethics
Do not use confidential information for personal advantage. If you identify potential ethical issues or misconduct, alert the editor through the review form or contact the editorial office.
When to Decline
If the manuscript is outside your expertise or you cannot complete the review in time, decline promptly so another reviewer can be invited. This keeps decisions timely for authors and protects review quality.
Review Structure
We recommend organizing your review with brief summary comments followed by major and minor points. Highlight strengths as well as limitations, and be specific about how authors can improve clarity, methodology, or interpretation.
Recommendation Options
Recommendations typically include accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. Use these categories consistently and explain your rationale so editors can make fair decisions. Avoid recommending acceptance if critical issues remain unresolved.
Thoughtful peer review strengthens research and supports compassionate care. JOD values reviewers who bring rigor and respect to this work. Thank you for your contribution and care.
Need Guidance?
Email [email protected] if you have questions about review expectations. We appreciate your service. Typical response time is within 1-2 business days.
