Tools and Guidance for Effective Editorial Work
JOD provides editors with resources that support ethical review, consistent decisions, and clear communication with authors and reviewers. This page summarizes key tools and where to get help. Use these resources to keep review cycles efficient and fair. It also supports consistent application of editorial policy across the team.
Policy Access
Ethics Guidance
Reviewer Support
Decision Templates
Workflow Clarity
Editorial Support
What Editors Can Use
Editorial Policies
Use the editorial policies page as the primary reference for ethics, conflicts of interest, and decision standards. This ensures consistent application of journal policies across all submissions. It is especially important for complex or sensitive cases.
Reviewer Guidelines
Share reviewer guidelines with invited reviewers to set expectations on confidentiality, constructive feedback, and timely responses. This improves review quality and author experience. This reduces delays and improves consistency.
Decision Support
Editors can request decision templates or guidance from the editorial office when handling complex cases. Clear templates help authors understand how to strengthen their work and reduce back and forth in revisions.
Key References for Editors
These resources support consistent decisions and efficient workflows.
Ethical Guidance
For manuscripts involving sensitive narratives or vulnerable populations, editors may consult the editorial office for ethics guidance. We encourage careful review and clear documentation of consent and confidentiality protections.
Communication Support
Editors can request assistance drafting decision letters or managing disputes. Clear, respectful communication helps maintain trust with authors and reviewers. We can advise on sensitive wording when needed.
Reviewer Recruitment
Editors can request help identifying qualified reviewers for specialized topics. The editorial office can assist with reviewer databases, past reviewer performance, and conflict checks to maintain fairness and speed.
Handling Appeals
If authors appeal a decision, editors may consult senior editorial staff for guidance. Resources include appeal response templates and procedural checklists to ensure consistency and transparency.
Strong editorial resources support consistent decisions, ethical publishing, and a respectful author experience. Consistency matters for all editors.
Need a Resource?
Email [email protected] to request templates or guidance. Include your manuscript ID when possible. Typical response time is within 1-2 business days.
