Journal of Public Health International

Journal of Public Health International

Journal of Public Health International – Editors Guidelines

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Editors Guidelines

Editorial guidance for Journal of Public Health International to ensure integrity, fairness, and high-quality public health publishing.

Support Rigorous Public Health Scholarship

Editors at JPHI uphold ethical standards, ensure quality, and guide manuscripts from submission to decision.

We value timely, fair, and transparent editorial leadership.

Editorial Role Overview

Quality Stewardship

Assess scope fit, scientific rigor, and public health relevance.

Ethical Oversight

Ensure compliance with ethics approvals, consent, and data integrity.

Reviewer Leadership

Select qualified reviewers and balance expertise, diversity, and independence.

Author Guidance

Provide clear, constructive feedback and decision rationale.

Editorial Workflow
1

Initial Screening

Confirm scope alignment, ethical approvals, and baseline quality.

2

Reviewer Selection

Invite independent reviewers with relevant methodological expertise.

3

Decision & Communication

Synthesize reviews, provide editorial guidance, and issue a decision.

Decision Criteria
  • Relevance: Clear contribution to public health policy, practice, or evidence.
  • Rigor: Sound methods, transparent reporting, and appropriate analysis.
  • Ethics: Proper approvals, consent, and protections for participants.
  • Clarity: Coherent structure, clear results, and actionable implications.
  • Novelty: Adds value beyond existing literature.
Ethics & Integrity
Editors should follow COPE guidance and ensure manuscripts meet standards for originality, ethical approval, and responsible data use.
  • Conflict of interest: Declare and recuse when necessary.
  • Confidentiality: Treat manuscripts and review materials as confidential.
  • Misconduct: Flag suspected plagiarism, data fabrication, or redundant publication.
  • Appeals: Consider appeals with a fair, documented process.
Reviewer Guidance for Editors
  • Select at least two independent reviewers with complementary expertise.
  • Balance methodological, regional, and policy perspectives when possible.
  • Encourage specific, actionable feedback for authors.
  • Request revisions that improve clarity and public health impact.
Timelines & Communication

Timely Decisions

Keep reviews on track and communicate decisions promptly.

Transparent Feedback

Provide clear reasoning and guidance on revision requirements.

Respectful Tone

Maintain professional and constructive communication with authors.

Special Issues & Collections

Editors may propose special issues aligned with emerging public health priorities. Proposals should include a rationale, scope, and proposed guest editors.

Submit a Special Issue Proposal

Support Resources
Questions or concerns? Contact the editorial office at [email protected].

Help Shape Public Health Research

Join JPHI as an editor and guide evidence that improves population health worldwide.

Last updated: January 2026